The continuation of this ambiguity undermines the prestige of the state and the credibility of its decisions. Government decisions must not turn into ink on paper, and the security decision must not be left hostage to understandings outside state institutions. There is no duality in decision, no exceptions for anyone, and no one is above the law.
How does the government allow arrangements of this kind, if true, when it had previously taken a decision on March 2 considering Hezbollah's military actions outside the law? Are the government's decisions binding on everyone, or is there someone who has the privilege of bypassing them?
What was stated in Hezbollah's statement regarding the existence of prior security arrangements with the security agencies places the government before a serious test of its credibility, and requires an immediate clarification from the ministers of interior and defense to reveal the truth of these arrangements and the parties that authorized them, and if proven, subject them to accountability and reckoning.
Contracts for 25 central offices have been signed to deliver fiber optics to 330,000 homes across Lebanon. Work has begun in 9 central offices: Nahr Beirut, Ras al-Nabaa, Khalde, Hadath, Jdeideh, Jounieh, Tripoli (Tal), Sidon, and Zahle. Work will begin in the remaining 16 central offices before the end of this year. Faster internet, stronger connection, and a digital Lebanon... home by home.
adults are not obliged to watch cruel images
severe fear and psychological shock
The article addresses an open confrontation within Lebanon's Judicial Council between Abboud and Al-Hajj, against the backdrop of what the headline describes as 'one name' that ble…
Lebanon Debate reported a clash inside the Supreme Judicial Council, described as face-to-face between Abboud and Al-Hajj. The available text did not include further details on the…