What they said الصمد ×

What is more dangerous than all of that is persisting in undermining the powers of the Prime Minister to marginalize his role, and obstructing the attempt to reform the banks.

It is a stab at his own signature, and against reforms under the pretext of protecting sectarian privileges.

Regardless of the constitutional right, the President of the Republic has set a new precedent we have not witnessed since the signing of the Taif Agreement, by challenging an article in a bill submitted by the government to reform the banks, bearing his signature and the signature of the Prime Minister.