US Senate election debate in Michigan: disputes over Israel, Iran and south Lebanon

Source coverage varied between focusing on the course of the debate and the mutual accusations between the candidates, focusing on the Democratic candidate's position on arming Israel and the confrontation with Iran, and highlighting the question of annexing south Lebanon and what the Walla website said about the absence of documents.

• العربي الجديد It opened with the details of the debate, the accusations and the interruptions, and highlighted Rogers' attempt to link Abdul to terrorism and to groups supporting Hamas, al-Qaeda and Hezbollah, Abdul's refusal to send defensive weapons to Israel, and his accusation that his rival was contradictory on tariffs and the war on Iran, while referring to a New York Times/Siena poll.
• صدى البلد It headlined the report with the Democratic candidate's position that Israel is no less dangerous than Iran and his refusal to arm it, focusing on the disagreements over US-Israeli relations, the war with Iran and military aid to Tel Aviv, without addressing the mutual accusations or the south Lebanon question.
• شبكة تواصل الإخبارية It was limited to a single sentence conveying a Democratic congressional candidate's statement that Israel is no less dangerous than Iran and his affirmation of refusing to arm it, without naming the candidates or mentioning the debate's context and details.
• Lebanon Debate It opened with the question of annexing south Lebanon in the debate, highlighting El-Sayed's query as to whether annexation was a goal of the Israeli war and his accusation that Israel was pushing Washington into war with Iran, against Rogers' support for military aid to Israel, and quoted the Walla website saying El-Sayed presented no information or documents about an Israeli plan to annex the south.